Archism, anarchism
I call archism the conception of an Origin from which the world comes from and on which it rests. This origin is Goodness and the world based on it is stable. This stability is sanctioned by the concept of substance. I call anarchism the denial of this Origin, which can take place in two ways: simply by denying that it exists or opposing to it. Since in the West this origin is God, anarchism is atheism. But it is also possible to think of God as anti-origin (Ferdinando Tartaglia). In this case anarchism can be reconciled with a faith; but speaking of God may be inappropriate in this case. If we remove the origin, we also remove the substance. Three positions: consider the ego a subjective correlative of the substance, to get rid of after getting rid of the first (buddhism, advaita vedanta); move towards an anti-origin (Tartaglia and Capitini; Lévinas); consider (again: Buddhism) all irrelevant ontological questions, get rid of them with the awareness that metaphysical categories were only support for social violence and seek a society that stems from the denial of origin.